Average Joe SCOTUS – Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck

OK, we all know New York would regulate the size of your bowel movements if they could, right?

These legislators in the United Socialist State of New York decided that if you’re going to operate a cable TV company in New York, and you have more than 36 channels (because they’re the kind to write arbitrary bullshit rules like that), you have to at least dedicate one channel to a public access channel that is on a “first-come, first-served” basis.

Time Warner, being a big ass cable company, were granted permission to operate there if they had four public access stations available. New York assigned a gestapo group to oversee it—Manhattan Community Access Corp. (MCAC).

Along come these beatnik assholes Halleck and Melendez and their shitty poetry and stupid socialist bullshit home video they called, “The 1% visit El Barrio.” I haven’t heard their poetry, or watched their dumb video. It’s just that all poetry is shitty, and I’d rather watch my cat lick his balls. Get a fucking job.

Because their poetry was especially shitty, these gestapo public access stations police at MCAC told them to get the fuck out and don’t come back.

Halleck and Menendez said, “First amendment, motherfuckers! I have a right to speak without you Nazi government assholes preventing me from doing so.”

But MCAC was like, “We’re a private group, not government. And frankly, you can speak to your heart’s content, just not on our fucking channel, asshole. Now get lost.”

So SCOTUS was asked to decided if MCAC was a government entity since it existed at the behest of government, even though it was a private entity. And did they violate the beatnik’s 1A rights?

The conservative justice don’t give a fuck about these beatnik’s garbage poetry and videos, and ruled for MCAC. Ginsberg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan being the hippies they are dissented—poetry is life!. They were like, “you right wing assholes don’t realize that when New York set this shit up to be public access, they made it an electronic public forum. Limiting these beatnik’s ability to use this public forum is a clear violation of 1A, and you guys can eat a bag of dicks.”

So then the right-wing justices were like, “Too bad we have the majority, assholes.” 5:4 decision for MCAC.

Hear oral arguments and/or read about the case here.

Average Joe SCOTUS – Bowman v. Monsanto [Classic]

Love ’em or hate ’em, Monsanto is a big fucking company. And they’re big, because they’ve made a product that farmers LOVE!

Here’s some sciency bullshit for your reading pleasure. We all know pesticides can be harmful to consumers, so Monsanto developed a seed that was resistant to their weed killer glyphosate, Glyphosate kills vegetation dead, largely by preventing plants from photosynthesizing or some shit like that, while being pretty much harmless to animals, such as humans, in small doses.

Biology lesson: Everything is a poison, what matters is the dose. So if people tell you a chemical is harmful, and they don’t tell you at what  dose it’s harmful, they’re talking shit. Like seriously, ignore it. The dose matters just as much when discussing this shit. People have literally died drinking too much water (overdose of H2O), and the most powerful poison known to man (botulinum) people inject right into their fucking face for vanity reasons because it’s such a low dose, it’s safe.

Back to the sciency bullshit. If you create a seed that resists glyphosate, you can use just glyphosate as your pesticide, and not the myriad of other pesticides you’d normally use to kill all the different weeds, yet your crop still grows. The overall list of potentially harmful chemicals on your crop is reduced, and thus is presumably safer to eat.

Sounds complicated, right? That’s because it is. Science is hard as fuck! Monsanto spend gazillions developing this shit, and they want to get paid for their investment, otherwise, why the hell would they do it?

So Monsanto patented their gene-edited seeds, and sell them to people with the agreement that they will buy new seeds from Monsanto every year, and won’t use seeds from the offspring of the previous year’s plants.

The gene edits are effectively clones, and all life mutates in nature (natural selection depends on this) as it procreates, so in order for it to work its best, you want a new crop of the same clones each year. Not 2nd generation mutated bullshit seeds.

Along comes this cheapskate motherfucker Bowman who signed a contract with Monsanto, and complied with their regs for a while. One thing Monsanto allows for in their regs, is selling second gen seeds to a grain elevator, which are then usually used to feed livestock and shit, not to replant for next year’s crop.

But Bowman did exactly that. He used seeds from a grain elevator, and planted that shit, in direct violation of his contract. This motherfucker planted them, used glyphosate to fertilize them, then whatever still grew, he knew it was the good shit and he could keep using it. Sneaky AF!

It’s basically like buying a Metallica album, then throwing it up on Napster so other people can get it free.  He was duplicating their patented shit and making money off of it without giving Monsanto their cut, and violating his contract with them. He know what he was doing.

So Monsanto sued and said, “Listen, we have a fucking contract. If you don’t want to use our shit, don’t use it. But if you do, you fucking pay us for it like you agreed to, you cheap bastard. You don’t go around using copies and act like it’s all good and shit.”

Bowman was like, “Man, I didn’t copy shit. Nature copied it. I just took advantage of what nature does, man!”

So SCOTUS was called, and asked to weigh in. SCOTUS wasn’t hearing Bowman’s bullshit. They unanimously told Bowman to go pound sand up his ass. They were so moved by Bowman’s bullshit, that they did the rare reading aloud of their decision.

Hear both oral arguments and the rare oral reading of the opinion, as well as read about the case here.

Average Joe SCOTUS – Mission Product Holdings Inc. v. Tempnology LLC.

These people at Tempnology made some clothing and shit meant for people doing physical activities, that helped keep the wearer cooler. Not cooler like Chuck Norris, but cooler like the other side of the pillow.

Mission Product agreed to sell their product, so they had rights to the sell the product, deploy the technology in their own products, and to use Tempnology’s trademarks, logos, and shit.

Tempnology however sucked at business, and ran up operating costs to the point where they had to file bankruptcy. As a result, they sought to rescind their contract with Mission because of the financial strain that contract put on them. Basically, they wanted more money than the contract entitled them to.

Mission was like, “WTF, man? We have a deal, bitch!”

Tempnology was like, “Bankruptcy, motherfucker. Have you heard of it? Fuck you, and your contract too!”

Mission was then like, “Your inability to run your god damn company doesn’t mean that we should lose money, not being able to exploit the contract we have with you. You gave your word, douchebag!”

I assume Mission were using Tempnology’s technology in their own products where Tempnology wasn’t making much money off of it, because they weren’t making it themselves. But I’m guessing, so don’t quote me on that shit.

We all know bankruptcy puts a hold on debtors, but it also allows for the potential rejection of what the case referred to as executory contracts, which are basically contracts still in effect and not completed (or fully executed).

SCOTUS didn’t feel sorry for Tempnology at all, though. They were luck, “Screw your bankruptcy. Mission can keep exploiting your technology because you all had an agreement. You don’t get to reject that agreement entirely because you hired a shitty accountant or something.”

Judgement for Mission Holding 8:1. Gorsuch dissented, not even seeing how Mission was being unfairly damaged here. Maybe the other eight can explain it to him.

Read about the case or hear oral arguments here.