Tag Archives: Gary Nolan
I Love NASA…But Let’s End It
As a libertarian, I’m generally against government programs, but on occasion, I find myself in their corner on things I feel as a libertarian, I should not be.
Some are debatable, such as the role of the EPA. While I would argue that their core mission of protecting us from polluters who would do others real harm, there is little doubt they have grown into a legislative monster with regulations significantly more overbearing than the simple task of protecting our right to life they’re charged with.![fef7711f-2675-4dbc-82aa-257d6b961731[1]](https://logicallibertarian.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/fef7711f-2675-4dbc-82aa-257d6b9617311.jpg?w=300&h=293)
One organization that stands out in my mind as having no basis to exist is NASA. I cannot logically argue that they are performing any duty of government as enumerated in the Constitution—they protect no rights whatsoever. Nor can I argue that a poor person who needs every tax dollar they’re compelled to give government that is given to NASA, should be forced do so.
One thing about NASA I feel we should all know, but sadly most don’t—a major selling point to the American people when NASA was proposed before its eventual inception in 1958, is that NASA shares all of its information freely with the public. You might think this is no big deal at first, but nothing could be further from the truth.
It’s called spinoff, and the list is mind-numbing. Using a random example for instance, in 2007, NASA helped develop Thermawing, a de-icing system for airplanes large and small. The companies now making this product don’t owe NASA a dime. They got “free” research and development (R&D), which made a product much cheaper and more readily available for all to use.
If Thermawing had been developed privately, the company that might have developed it would have needed to spend a fortune on research—money they likely didn’t have, which would have driven costs so high, it may never have even come to market. But NASA is essentially a benevolent R&D sugar-daddy, and as such, many products we have today we have because the “free” R&D of NASA made them affordable enough to bring to market.![Kelly-thermawing-detail[1]](https://logicallibertarian.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/kelly-thermawing-detail1.jpg?w=300&h=169)
NASA has also done an amazing job of inciting children to become future scientists. Many of today’s engineers and physicists would not be where they are today if they hadn’t heard those simple words, “One small step for a man, one giant leap for mankind.”
As science is obviously very important to me, I’m very thankful for a most of the great work NASA has done, as we all should be. But at the end of the day, if I were president, I’d have no reason not to veto every bill that crossed my desk to fund it.
There is no doubt they’ve served the greater good. But “the greater good” isn’t the duty of government, protecting rights is.![nasa[1]](https://logicallibertarian.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/nasa1.jpg?w=300&h=249)
That’s the funny thing about being libertarian that many lose sight of. We can all think of things we are for or against that conflict with our views on the role of government, NASA is mine. But us libertarians often pride ourselves on standing up for liberty we don’t even agree with.
I hear Republicans say they’re for free speech, then vote for laws to prevent burning flags, or laws to quiet the Westboro Baptist Church assholes…er, I mean, parishioners.
I hear Democrats say they are for free speech, but then try to pass legislation that prevents the Koch brothers from publicly supporting liberty-minded candidates.
In both instances, they’re being hypocrites. Free speech isn’t about protecting speech you deem acceptable, it’s about letting people say and do whatever they want, no matter how heinous we might believe it is, so long as they aren’t violating the rights of someone else.
Personally, I think recreational drug use is a silly habit, but I fight for the right to legalize drugs, get rid of EMTALA which forces hospitals to treat everyone, then let natural selection and bad decisions run their course. It’s your life, if you want to end it with a needle in your arm or a pipe in your mouth, that’s your decision to make.![BW-Girl-Smoking-Pot[1]](https://logicallibertarian.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/bw-girl-smoking-pot1.jpg?w=300&h=250)
Libertarianism is about the right to be free, period. People often ask me if I like Hayek, Von Mises, or other libertarian economists, and I do. But I can honestly say I don’t care.
Even if I knew libertarianism would make the economy worse, (which I don’t believe for a minute) I would still support it, because to me, liberty is far more important.
If I knew libertarianism would lead to more gun deaths, or tragic accidents due to a lack of our current litany of warning labels on everything, I’d still support it. Tragic deaths are bad, but a loss of liberty to prevent them is even worse.
Every once in a while, people go skydiving, their chute fails, and they die. But we don’t ban skydiving. Divers learn from it instead. Every year we have thousands of vehicular deaths, but we don’t ban cars. We learn from them and build safer cars.
So why ban drugs or mandate warning labels that only serve the stupidest of people? Anyone smart enough to read a warning label on Liquid Drano should damn well be smart enough not to drink it.
It’s easy to champion some of the wonderful things government does, and NASA is easily at the top of that list for me. But by virtue of being tax-payer funded, it is ultimately a government agent putting a gun to our heads and compelling all of us to fund their scientific endeavors, and that I cannot abide.
So I have two choices: I can either be a hypocrite and support NASA while calling myself a libertarian, or I can see NASA in the same light as the postal service and AMTRAK, and support selling their interests to someone in the private sector and washing our hands of it. As much as I love NASA, I’ll choose the latter.
How Do We Get Better Cops? Start By Ending All The Hypocrisies.
With all of the protests lately regarding the police killings of young black men, a lot of people are lashing out at the men and women in blue.
In New York City, protestors were heard chanting:
What do we want?
Dead Cops!
When do we want it?
Now!
While some may assume that being libertarian, I hate the police, the fact is that I don’t. I hate what government has made them become, and that’s a pretty big distinction.![ap_eric_garner_reaction_12_jc_141203_16x9_992[1]](https://logicallibertarian.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/ap_eric_garner_reaction_12_jc_141203_16x9_9921.jpg?w=300&h=169)
First things first, I hate bad cops with a passion. If you’re given the honor of serving your community, you damn well should remember what an honor it is. If you did it for the money or the power, in my opinion, you’re likely a bad cop already.
I feel that police officers who commit crimes should receive more punitive sentencing than the average citizen. Not only do they know better, but they’re people we trust to enforce these laws, and they’ve abused that trust.
They should be held to a significantly higher standard. Instead, they’re often given an opportunity to resign sans any prosecution on things that might put the rest of us in jail. This often lax, or sometimes non-existent, prosecution of police officers who break the law breeds a massive amount of distrust.
But that being said, bad cops are like bad people—a very small minority of the community. Most selflessly put their lives on the line for us every day, and let’s be honest, don’t get much thanks for it. The days of little kids wanting to grow up to be Andy Griffith, Elliot Ness, or Wyatt Earp are long gone for the most part—which is pretty sad.

I am not one to argue that racism doesn’t exist in America, but I will vehemently argue that racism has both been marginalized and has become equalized.
I think that idealistic or fundamental racists like the KKK or New Black Panthers, as well as people who either publicly or secretly hold such hateful views, are easily a small minority. Furthermore, those people are generally pretty quiet about it because they know it’s no longer widely acceptable behavior as it might have been 40+ years ago or more. It’s not like there are polls asking people if they are bigots, so confirming my opinion is difficult.
But also, I believe that the percentage of black people who hate white people has equalized to the number of whites who hate blacks. While I’ve never attacked someone because of their race, I’ve been the victim of racism a couple of times, and I’m white. Only advancements in scientific understanding and critical thinking will eradicate these non-sensical views, and that just takes time.
With each decade, it is painfully obvious race relations improve, so there’s not much need to do anything different than what we are already doing.
Many of the black people protesting against cops however, are doing EXACTLY what they profess to be the wrong thing to do. Their argument, whether you agree or not, is that the police are bigoted against black people, yet in response, they are being bigoted against cops—a blaring hypocrisy.
Assuming a few of these people have been a victim of a crime, called the police, and had an officer respond to assist them, are they now willing to end the officer’s life who may have helped them previously just because he/she wears that uniform?
I get that these people are angry, but if the desired outcome is to be treated as respectable citizens, behaving in a supremely disrespectful way is not going to help that cause.
The second issue is that if these folks are ever the victim of a crime, are they renouncing their right to call 911? Because if they don’t, that’s also being entirely hypocritical.![911[1][1]](https://logicallibertarian.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/91111.png?w=300&h=207)
Throughout all of these incidents, I’ve tried to use critical thought instead of arriving at some preconceived notion. While I admit that I’m a science geek, and therefore tend to think more analytically than most, asking people to exhibit critical thought as a general rule, should not be deemed an unreasonable request.
So where is all this police hatred coming from? While some believe it’s the actions of the police alone, I feel the issue is far deeper than that.
I see the issue as predominately one of an ever-growing policed state. People instinctively want to be free, just as our forefathers intended. Despite the fact that few identify as libertarian, most people tend to agree with the “no victim, no crime” mantra.
Since Libertarians rarely got more than 5% of the vote, it’s well-known that 95% of black people elected politicians who pass the laws they’re then mad at the police for enforcing. A majority are Democrats, but the GOP isn’t entirely innocent here either. They’re effectively their own worst enemy. But again, it’s entirely hypocritical to vote for politicians who promise to pass these laws, then lashing out at police when they’re charged with enforcing them.
So if we want better relationships between the citizenry and the police, I have four easy solutions:
- Stop being bigoted against cops in an effort to stop them being bigoted.
- Stop passing laws you wouldn’t support a cop killing someone over.
- Don’t call 911 when you need a cop, then treat them like dirt when they respond.
- Stop allowing police to evade prosecution by simply resigning. Pass laws that make it clear, government corruption of any type will be dealt with more severely, not less than that of the average citizen.
It’s really that simple.
Eric Garner’s Death Should Never Be Equated To Michael Brown’s
A friend of mine who happens to be a government employee and now a died-in-the-wool statist (he keeps calling himself a liberal, but I don’t think he knows what it means) started a conversation with me stating that “you know how much of a liberal (read: statist) I am, but when is it OK to fight back against the police, get killed over it, then be labeled the victim?”
I read a good bit of the grand jury evidence against Michael Brown in Missouri, and like the grand jury, came to the conclusion Michael Brown was shot in self-defense.
I watched in disgust as he robbed a convenience store, forcefully pushing aside the owner as he was confronted for stealing the cigarillos. So I have little reason to believe the “gentle giant” argument put forth by those who knew him. Kind people don’t do what he did to that innocent store owner.
See the video here.
While I’m not glad he is dead, I have no reason to believe Michael Brown treated Darren Wilson with any more respect than that victimized store owner. I feel that if Michael Brown is a victim, he is only a victim of his own aggression, not a racist police officer’s actions.
But the Eric Garner death has a completely different meaning to me; one I cannot ignore.
Whereas Michael Brown robbed a store and attacked a police officer it seems, both felonious activities, and both with clearly defined victims; the impetus for police action against Eric Garner is very different.
Here is the video account of what happened. The actual interaction that lead to Garner’s death is at the end of the video at approximately the 8-minute mark.
Medical examiners ruled the death a homicide, due to neck compressions, as one can imagine. Famed medical examiner Michael Baden backed up the findings.
But what led to the police confronting Eric Garner in the first place?
Eric Garner was selling untaxed cigarettes in front of local area businesses, garnering complaints. New York has a $4.35 tax on packs of cigarettes from the state, but add to that, a $1.50 tax by the city of New York, and they are by far, the cigarette taxing capital of the United States.
This overtaxing of cigarettes in the city has led to an underground market for untaxed cigarettes bought out-of-state, them smuggled in and sold on the street. Often referred to as “loosies,” whereas a normal pack of cigarettes go for $14.50 in NYC, Eric Garner’s loosies would typically sell for around $8.00.
While I understand that businesses don’t like people outside their stores selling “illegal” goods, the sidewalk is public property. Aside from store owners who were annoyed, Eric Garner’s only victim would have been the city and state of New York for lost tax revenue—he was harming no fellow citizens.
The police are not rightfully given much of a choice on which laws they choose to enforce. Even if they didn’t agree with the law, they are sworn to uphold it, and regarding the cigarette tax, they did exactly that.
When I wrote The Point Of A Gun two years ago, I asked people to consider this basic principle when considering a proposed law. Would I be willing to kill someone over it? If not, I shouldn’t ask government to potentially kill someone for me over it.
Some people felt I was fear-mongering at the time, making up ludicrous arguments to promote libertarianism. Surely no police officer would kill someone over something so benign as cigarette taxes, they would argue.![Utah-DPS-SWAT[1]](https://logicallibertarian.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/utah-dps-swat1.jpg?w=300&h=225)
Apologies for saying us libertarians told you so, but…we told you so.
Eric Garner may have been a menace to local businesses, he did have a long criminal history for more serious crimes, and he certainly could have been more cooperative with the police. But while he was clearly irate, I didn’t see him attempt to attack any officer, so there was no victim the police were protecting at the time, including themselves.
If Eric Garner had been murdering a homeless guy, raping a woman, or molesting a child, no one would be upset he is dead now at the hands of the police. We’re mostly all willing to kill someone under those circumstances.
So that means the policeman’s actions were not the problem. The problem is, and often always will be, government oppression that leads to mini-revolts like this one.
If libertarians were in power, Garner would have been no different from any other street vendor selling random goods, but in New York, liberty is all but dead, especially for smokers.
So if you want freedom, you must start voting that way. Otherwise, you have no right complaining when the government carries out orders you essentially voted for them to enact. People yearning to be free will stand up for their rights, and under these statist-like rules in New York, will either get accidentally or purposefully killed for defying them.
We libertarians will always ask, “What is so wrong with the concept of No-Victim-No-Crime?” Because we can surely tell you what is wrong with statism. It results in deaths of victimless “criminals” like Eric Garner who should be alive today, and able to sell whatever the hell he wants to sell, so long as he isn’t hurting anyone.
Poll: Who/What Is To Blame For Eric Garner’s Death
A Love Of Science Comes From The Strangest Places: My Fateful Night In A Pool Hall
As I began my transition from a high school student to part of the labor force years ago, my very first job was at a local pool hall/carry out restaurant called Top Cue Billiards & Pizza in Whitehall, Ohio.
We had two rooms, the front room for food and socializing, and the adjoining room which had eight billiard tables. Although we didn’t serve alcohol, there was a bar next door. While it had a couple of pool tables of its own, it was not uncommon to have many of the bar’s patrons come next door to Top Cue for some action over and above the typical $1 a game folly you might find at the bar.
My passion for pool started as a boy. My grandfather had a pool table in his basement; the only pool table anyone owned in my limited social circle as a child. Twice a year, on Father’s Day and Christmas, we all gathered at grandma & grandpa’s house.
There weren’t many kids my age at these gatherings, so aside from grandpa’s “pull my finger” trick, it was generally pretty boring for me just sitting around while the adults caught up on their lives. So I’d sit there on pins and needles until an adult FINALLY suggested we play a little pool.![Creation_Of_Pull_My_Finger_by_oriel6six6[1]](https://logicallibertarian.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/creation_of_pull_my_finger_by_oriel6six61.png?w=300&h=150)
At sixteen, I discovered Top Cue was in the next town over. So I’d beg mom for a few bucks and the keys to her car to go play. In the first two years I frequented it, I became an OK player, but was by no means special.
After graduation, I received a summer job at Top Cue and began playing significantly more. We didn’t have an official closing time, per se, we just shut down when there were no customers left, which was often around 1:00-2:00 am.
Once we closed, one patron or another would often hang around and practice with me, since I couldn’t play on the clock. Practicing until daylight came was not out of the norm.
There were a lot of wonderful characters that were incredibly kind to me through the years there; they taught me a lot about life and the game.
There was “Shotgun” (Never knew his real name), your archetypical Harley-Davidson rider; he looked like Jesus with an extra 200 lbs. He came complete with his “I may not go down in history, but I’ll go down on your little sister” T-shirt.
Shotgun loved to play one-pocket. He wasn’t much good at it, but he enjoyed what can arguably be called the chess-match of pocket billiards more than any other game. Me being the type who loved mental challenges as well, learned to love it too.
There was “Fast” Eddie, A 70-year-old black preacher who moved at a snail’s pace, thus the facetious “Fast Eddie” moniker, stolen from the movie The Hustler.

Eddie was possibly the kindest person I’ve ever met, and was one of the few people who would give me a good one-pocket match without needing to gamble on it, since it was against his religious beliefs.
There was “Taiwan Tony” who was neither from Taiwan, nor named Tony. The best hustler I ever met. He probably took to teaching me the most. He oddly never tried to hustle me personally, probably because I was hooking him up with free practice time in the process. But I appreciated him imparting some great wisdom on me nonetheless.
Tony could beat someone out of $40 at $2 a game, and have them leave thinking they almost had him—trust me, they didn’t. He would play horrible, but just-good-enough-to-win, one minute; then switch gears and play lights-out to beat a much more formidable opponent the next. It was poetry in motion to watch.
Although he spoke perfectly good English, albeit with a strong accent, Tony was a master at purposefully acting like he was a dumb foreigner who could barely speak English, in order to win a buck or two.
There was Kenny McCoy, a man Pool & Billiard Magazine called one of the greatest shot makers of all time; many simply knew him as the truck driver. The kindest soul you’ll ever meet, he never went pro, but many pros came to town looking for a game with him, and left town with an empty wallet.
There are shots I’ve seen him make that make me laugh just thinking about how seemingly impossible they were. And these weren’t trick shots he did for fun after trying several times, these were shots he pulled off with very high stakes on the line. It was almost scary to witness, but rest assured, I’ll tell my grand kids about Kenny if I ever have any.
There were also the Williams twins. Us regulars could tell them apart fairly well, but it was always fun to watch someone be afraid to play one of them because of an experience playing the other, thinking it was the same guy. Then again, they were both fairly evenly matched, so it really didn’t matter anyway. They were fixtures in the place, and always made me, and every other patron feel welcome and part of “the club.” You almost couldn’t imagine Top Cue without them.
There was a man named Butch Poe, a great player who was always happy to play me for a sandwich. I could never beat him, but it was a great learning experience getting my ass beat by him for the mere cost of a sub and a Dr. Pepper.
Butch once had a guy quit in the middle of a best-of-seven 9-ball match with him after Butch had run the first five of seven racks without a single miss. ![IMG_9076_-_Copy[1]](https://logicallibertarian.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/img_9076_-_copy1.jpg?w=300&h=140)
When Butch asked the kid why he was quitting, the kid responded, “I can’t beat you, man.”
Butch promptly responded, “How do you know; you haven’t even shot yet!”
After losing $50 in a game he didn’t even get to participate in, the kid was not amused.
One night, a regular named Brian came in, and was looking for a game. I was about to close up, so I figured I’d give him a go after hours like usual. We entered into a $20 a game one-pocket match. At the time, I was making maybe $100-$120 a week, but on that fateful night, I lost $320—and yes, I remember it to the penny.
Losing three weeks pay was a horrible event in the short-term, but it was ultimately a life changing event for the better.
Many of you know my love for science, but oddly enough, it didn’t come from a science teacher in school, it came from that night. Losing like that taught me the value of analytics; that I shouldn’t just play by feel, but I should study, learn, and be able to assess my abilities and correct my mistakes on the fly. I could only do that if I actually knew what I was doing.
It may have seemed like a gambling addiction issue I had that night, but it was simply me refusing to believe I couldn’t correct my game, which was poorer than normal that night. But how could I correct it, I never really learned how to play right in the first place?
As a result, I immersed myself in lessons with Jay, the owner, who sadly died shortly after. But I also studied with all the people above, soaking up every bit of knowledge from them I could. Why them? Because they all knew MORE then me.
I also started learning from videos and books from a pool teaching legend named Robert Byrne, a man with a degree in engineering, he essentially taught physics and how it applied to billiards, beginning my love of physics which carried on long after my love for pool waned.
Here’s a little excerpt if you’re interested.
Since then, I’ve taken golf lessons, studied the game-theory of poker, and read about the physics of autocross racing, to name a few.
While I may be a master at none of these sports, what I am is someone who has the knowledge and ability to make myself better at any one of them given the time and motivation to practice. What I didn’t do was just jump in and “see what happens.”
This has also allowed me to share my love of these sports with others by passing on what I’ve learned from those wonderful characters from Top Cue and my various other sporting ventures that followed, and do it in a way that I’ll know I’m not just passing on bullshit.
It doesn’t matter how you become a skeptic, showing an eagerness to learn all you can about that which you are passionate about; if you endeavor to do it right, then you must learn to do it right. You can only get that information from the science that knowledgeable people can impart on you.
There were a million horrible players who didn’t know the first thing about pool, yet attempted to teach me. But because I had learned from some of the best who actually knew what they were doing, I knew to ignore the riff-raff. Most were drunken fools.
A great truism is that you don’t know what you don’t know. Therefore, it is impossible to teach yourself, you can only learn. But how you choose to learn is entirely up to you. I suggest learning from those who are better than you at your chosen passion, but most importantly, those who can explain the science of what you want to do so you truly understand the hows and whys.
Science is everywhere, not just a classroom. It is not something we should be intimidated by, it’s a process we can all benefit from whether we’re a professor of physics, or a simply layman with a passion for learning like me. Embracing the scientific method will make you infinitely better at whatever your passion may be. Enjoy the ride.

